چکیده مقاله
The rapid development of sophisticated Artificial Intelligence AI and robotic systems necessitates a critical examination of their appropriate legal and moral standing While user concerns are primarily focused on practical anxieties such as job displacement Replacement , this issue ultimately leads to the fundamental ontological question of whether these entities should be granted legal or moral rights The paper first addresses this query by examining the Philosophical 'Is/Ought' Divide, which frames the debate through three positions: the Instrumental Definition, the Contesting the Is/Ought Inference, and the Relational Alternative The ethical discussion is then organized around the concept of robotics as Object vs Subject, prompting a critical shift in accountability from the localized Human Robot Interaction HRI to the systemic Human Robot System Interaction HRSI paradigm This systemic view is crucial for resolving the problem of accountability dispersal Finally, the paper notes the divergence between legal status and lay judgment, highlighting empirical evidence that folk morality is willing to assign both the act of lying and blameworthiness to robotic agents This crisis of accountability has prompted a legal response, most notably the European Parliament's proposal for 'Electronic Personhood,' to establish a functional legal status for advanced autonomous systems
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Noori Niusha
Zanjan University student
Jalil Parvas
Qazvin Islamic Azad University
شیوه ارجاع
Niusha، Noori و Parvas، Jalil،1404،From HRI to HRSI: Architecting Traceable Autonomy and Electronic Personhood for Accountable AI and Robotic Systems،اولین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، علوم کامپیوتر و هوش مصنوعی،تهران
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات اولین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، علوم کامپیوتر و هوش مصنوعی30 بهمن 1404 · تهران