چکیده مقاله
AbstractUniversal grammar is a theory in linguistics that suggests all possible natural human languages are based upon an innate common structural basis However there are some criticisms against this theory of Noam Chomsky Some of these criticisms are mentioned here For example, as Withers 2010 argued, some Critics state that Chomsky is “guilty of overgeneralization” Many of Chomsky’s opponents deride his assertion as “unsubstantiated” by empirical research Others find a weakness in his theory on the grounds that it neglects to account for environmental considerations Keywords: Chomsky, Universal Grammar, Criticisms
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Sara Attarzadeh
Faculty member of Higher Education Complex of Bam
Raziyeh Bagheripour
English teacher in High Scools
شیوه ارجاع
Attarzadeh۱, Sarasadat and Bagheripour, Raziyeh,1398,An Introduction to Universal Grammar and Criticisms Against it,3rd International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and History Studies
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات سومین کنفرانس بین المللی مطالعات زبان، ادبیات، فرهنگ و تاریخ22 مهر 1398