چکیده مقاله
Selecting the optimal turbine for water conveyance systems is a critical decision in water engineering projects, directly influencing energy efficiency, investment costs, and environmental sustainability Any bias or error in this decision making process can have long term consequences for system performance and overall project efficiency This study proposes a game theoretic framework that eliminates human judgment from the weighting process in multi criteria decision making MCDM for turbine selection By modeling each technical criterion as an independent non cooperative player and employing Nash Equilibrium, the method produces objective, transparent, and reproducible weights The proposed approach was tested on a hypothetical dataset of four primary criteria purchase cost, hydraulic efficiency, service life, and maintenance cost The algorithm converged to a stable equilibrium within fewer than 500 iterations, without requiring any expert evaluation The findings demonstrate the framework's potential to improve transparency, resist collusion, and be adapted to other high stakes infrastructure projects in water and energy sectors
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Ahmad Reza Abbaspour
Department of Civil Engineering, Shi C , Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Mahmood Reza Shaghaghian
Department of Civil Engineering, Shi C , Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
شیوه ارجاع
Abbaspour, Ahmad Reza and Shaghaghian, Mahmood Reza,1404,Nash Equilibrium-Based Weighting Mechanism for Optimal Turbine Selection in Water Transmission Lines Eliminating Stakeholder Bias through Game Theory,Ninth International Conference on Management, Optimization and Development of Energy Infrastructures,Tehran
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات نهمین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، بهینه سازی و توسعه زیرساخت های انرژی29 آبان 1404 · تهران