چکیده مقاله
In most shipwrecks, marine salvage operations to lift a sunken ship and then tow it to a safe shoreline is not economically defensible, and this impedes the shipowner from caving in such an unaffordable obligation This descriptive analytical research investigated the legal implications of shipwrecks using library resources From the literature, the owner's disobedience and unaccountability towards salvage operations due to exorbitant rates disagree with the legal principles and the content of the international convention, as this marine event exerts coastal damages to the host country, interrupts ships on their trajectories, and leftovers significantly adverse environmental impacts Thus, all these need to be compensated by the shipowner or the flag state, which is a member of the Nairobi Convention In parallel, there are environmental laws connected to public order acts which all lessen the shipowner's influence in refusing salvage operations Collectively, the shipowner is prohibited from illegally leaving the sunken ship and its parts in nature even under the retribution tolerance clause
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Amir Hossein Moradi
Master of International Trade Law, Tehran University
Saba Esmaeilzadeh
Master of Criminal Law and Criminology, Shandiz Institute of Higher Education
شیوه ارجاع
Moradi, Amir Hossein and Esmaeilzadeh, Saba,1404,The Legal Implications of Shipwrecks,The 10th international conference on jurisprudence, law, advocacy and social sciences in the horizon of Iran 1404,Mashhad
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات دهمین کنفرانس بین المللی فقه، حقوق ، وکالت و علوم اجتماعی در افق ایران ۱۴۰۴26 مرداد 1404 · مشهد