چکیده مقاله
In recent decades, the discourse approach for analyzing specific genres and professional discourse communities has gained significant traction The globalization of knowledge and the synergy between disciplines have opened up new avenues for interdisciplinary studies This paper critically examines Construction Project Management CPM through the lens of systems thinking, challenging traditional linear methodologies that dominate the field While conventional approaches like the Critical Path Method CPM , Program Evaluation and Review Technique PERT , and Project Management Body of Knowledge PMBOK provide structured frameworks, they often fail to account for the dynamic complexity, emergent behaviors, and feedback loops inherent in modern construction projects By integrating systems thinking principles—such as holism, interconnectivity, feedback mechanisms, and adaptive learning—this paper proposes a conceptual shift from rigid, blueprint driven management to a more flexible, resilient, and stakeholder inclusive approach A case study analysis of a metro rail project illustrates how systems thinking can uncover hidden inefficiencies, improve decision making, and enhance project adaptability The findings suggest that future CPM methodologies should blend traditional tools with systems dynamics, causal loop modeling, and continuous stakeholder feedback to better navigate uncertainty and complexity
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Ali Sayyad
Department Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Pardis Branch, Iran
Mehran Adli
Department Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Shahriar Branch, Tehran, Iran
شیوه ارجاع
Sayyad, Ali and Adli, Mehran,1404,Beyond the Blueprint: A Critical Review of Construction Project Management through the Lens of Systems Thinking,11th National Conference on Interdisciplinary Research in Engineering and Management,Tehran
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات یازدهمین همایش ملی تحقیقات میان رشته ای در علوم مهندسی و مدیریت31 تیر 1404 · تهران