چکیده مقاله
This study conducts a comparative analysis of civil liability for the acts of others in the Iranian and German legal systems, highlighting the interplay between Islamic legal principles and secular civil law traditions Drawing on doctrinal research, it examines key provisions of the Iranian Civil Liability Code Articles 1, 7, and 12 and the German Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch Sections 831 and 832 , supported by case law and scholarly commentary The analysis reveals that both systems prioritize fault based liability, but German law employs a broader application of strict liability, particularly in parental responsibility, and a rebuttable presumption of employer fault, while Iranian law emphasizes judicial discretion and Islamic concepts like daman guarantee and ta’sir causation The findings suggest that Iran could adopt structured strict liability for high risk contexts, while Germany might benefit from flexible judicial approaches to address emerging issues like artificial intelligence This study enriches comparative law scholarship and offers insights for legal reforms to enhance fairness and adaptability in civil liability frameworks
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
محمد کاظم خانجانی
Law Department, Kerman Institute of Higher Education, Kerman, Iran
شیوه ارجاع
Khanjani, Mohammad Kazem,1404,Comparative Analysis of Civil Liability for the Acts of Others in Iranian and German Legal Systems,6th International Conference on Humanities, Educational Sciences, Law and Social Sciences
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات ششمین کنفرانس بین المللی علوم انسانی، علوم تربیتی، حقوق و علوم اجتماعی30 خرداد 1404