چکیده مقاله
The main purpose of this study was to study the differences among six translators in their application of strategies while translating proper names in the Holy Qur’an from Arabic into English Using Chesterman’s 1997 model, proper names in the Holy Qur’an as translated by Yusef Ali, Pickthall, Saffarzadeh, Arberry, Qarai and Shakir were analyzed In all, 100 proper names were extracted and analysed The results illustrated ‘loan translation’ had been used most by all the six translators; ‘paraphrase’ was used the least by all translators expect Saffarzade and Shakir Shakir used both ‘paraphrase’ and ‘synonymy’ minimally; whereas, Saffarzade used ‘synonymy’ minimally Another finding was that all the six translators had used only three of the whole list of strategies that had been introduced by Chesterman 1997 Further, it was observed that the six translators were statistically different in their application of each single strategy Finally, each translator had used the three strategies from Chesterman’s 1997 model significantly differently The results of this study could be used by students and instructors of translation studies particularly those working on translation of religious texts
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Mohammad Reza falahati qadimi fumani
Ph D , Chairman, Department of Computational Linguistics, Regional Information Center for Science and Technology, Shiraz, Iran
khadije izadpanah
M A , Department of Foreign Language, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
شیوه ارجاع
falahati qadimi fumani, Mohammad Reza and izadpanah, khadije,1395,Strategy application in translation of Qur’anic proper names: An analysis within Chesterman’s (1997) model,THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT ISSUES OF LANGUAGES, DIALECTS AND LINGUISTICS,Ahvaz
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات دومین کنفرانس بین المللی بررسی مسائل جاری زبان ها، گویش ها و زبان شناسی12 بهمن 1396 · اهواز