چکیده مقاله
Background: Risk management is a rapidly growing field in most organizations around the world Universities are responsible for generating the human capital needed to promote social development This is associated with risks, so training leaders must embrace risk management and implement appropriate policies to address these risks Risk management in terms of academic research, courses and degrees is very important in universities However, in most aspects of university management, there is no evidence for risk management The recent outbreak of the coronavirus has affected higher education institutions around the world However, risk management in universities has not received as much attention as it should Given the dynamic nature of the technological, political, economic, and social environments in which universities are located, these centers face a myriad of uncertainties that tend to create a very complex set of potential risks These potential risks, if not properly managed and managed, can become serious challenges for universities it is necessary for the university staff to have sufficient information about the measures taken in this regard so that they can help the university officials in necessary cases and has the important roles in this regard This study was conducted to determine the risk management Evaluation in Staff’s Perspective of Iran University Medical Sciences in 2021 method: The present study is a descriptive cross sectional study with samples of 224 administrative staff of Iran University of Medical Sciences who were selected by continuous method Zaboli et al 's Risk Management Questionnaire 2010 which was used to assess the validity of the content of the two main questionnaires from the views of experts, including three faculty members of the School of Nursing and Midwifery The judges' opinions were then included in the questionnaires to the extent that loyalty to the main tool was not compromised The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated by analyzing the first 20 questionnaires of the reliability of the tool again and this sample was excluded from the study Accordingly, Cronbach's alpha coefficient α = 98 confirmed the reliability of this tool Risk management was classified into six dimensions, the first dimension of which is related to the level of employees' knowledge of risk management, the second dimension of risk management status, the third dimension of policies and procedures, the fourth dimension of training status Risk, the fifth dimension was the position of risk management and finally the sixth dimension was monitoring, analysis, evaluation and risk control In total, the questionnaire was examined in 45 questions on a 5 point Likert scale and was classified into three levels: poor score less than 3 , moderate score 3 to 4 and good score more than4 The data were analyzed using SPSS software descriptive and inferential statistics the numerical indices of minimum, maximum, mean and standard deviation for the quantitative variables of the research were used Friedman test was used to examine the relationship between domains and independent t test, analysis ofvariance and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to examine the relationship between individual variables and risk management Results: The results showed that the majority of employees 59 4% were women and the majority 48 7% were in the age group of 45 36 years The majority of employees 72 8% were married Most of participants 54 4% worked in administrative headquarters More than half of the employees 53 1% had a university degree at the undergraduate level and only 12 5% of them had completed risk management courses The results showed that Risk management in the field of knowledge of employees with risk management with an average of 2 60±0/84 highest and in the field of monitoring, analysis, assessment and control of risk with an average of 2 38±0/87 had the lowest average score among other areas The total score of risk management was 2 44±0/82, which indicates that the understanding of the administrative staff of Iran University of Medical Sciences was poor The result of Friedman test showed that there is a statistically significant relationship between employees' knowledge of risk management and all areas of risk management p = 0 00 Statistical tests showed that risk management had a statistically significant relationship with the variables of gender P = 0 02 , risk management p
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Hassan Ramazanpour Sargiz
Master of Nursing Management, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Marzieh Adel Mehraban
Department of Nursing Management, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Shima Haghani
Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
شیوه ارجاع
Ramazanpour Sargiz, Hassan and Adel Mehraban, Marzieh and Haghani, Shima,1402,Risk Management Evaluation in Staff’s Perspective of Iran University Medical Sciences in 2021,The 15th International Conference on Health, Treatment and Health Promotion
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات پانزدهمین کنفرانس بین المللی بهداشت، درمان و ارتقای سلامت1 دی 1402