چکیده مقاله
Critical Discourse Analysis CDA henceforth is applied in this study to examine the representation of masculinity and the positive framing of male violence in social media comments, specifically YouTube comments, in an Eastern society The study investigates how language is used to normalize and positively justify male violence while consistently shifting blame and putting guilt onto female victims It also investigates how gendered narratives of masculine culture shape perceptions of violence and victimization Through an analysis of ten comments, the study identifies two primary patterns: 1 the framing of male violence as justifiable, often by portraying the female victim as responsible or deserving of the violence, and 2 the emotional bias in victim blaming narratives that position women as responsible for the violence occurred to them The findings reveal a broader cultural bias in favor of masculinity The findings are reached by conducting a linguistic analysis and an ideological one in a form of discussion Those are done adopting: Fairclough’s 1995 three dimensional approach, Halliday and Mathiessen’s 1985 Systemic Functional linguistics SFL , Goffman’s 1974 concept of frame and Entman’s 1993 concept of selection and salience framing
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Yusra Qasim Ali
Department of English Language, Faculty of Theology, Letters, History and Arts, National University of Sciences and Technology Politehnica, Bucharest, University Centre in Pitești, Romania
شیوه ارجاع
Qasim Ali, Yusra,1403,Representations of Masculinity: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Framing Violence Positively,The 10th International Conference on Languages, Linguistics, Translation and Literature,Ahvaz
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات دهمین کنفرانس بین المللی بررسی مسائل جاری زبان ها، زبان شناسی، ترجمه و ادبیات13 بهمن 1403 · اهواز