چکیده مقاله
This article closely examines how the United Kingdom justified its 2003 invasion of Iraq through the lens of the English School’s solidarist principles, with a particular emphasis on the Responsibility to Protect R2P It utilizes primary government documents, official speeches, and institutional reports to illustrate how the UK framed its intervention as a humanitarian obligation, despite significant opposition from NATO and the absence of UN authorization The findings indicate that, although the UK employed solidarist rhetoric to rationalize its actions, the underlying motivations for the intervention were primarily geopolitical interests and strategic partnerships The instability and humanitarian crises that ensued in Iraq further undermined the UK’s moral arguments This analysis underscores the challenges and contradictions inherent in translating solidarist ideals into practice and contributes to the ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of moral justifications for intervention within a diverse international system
کلیدواژهها
نویسندگان
Mohammad Samiei
PhD Candidate of British Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Hadi Vaez Mahdavi
Master's Degree of Diplomacy and International Organizations, Faculty of International Relations, University of Foreign Ministry, Tehran, Iran
شیوه ارجاع
Samiei, Mohammad and Vaez Mahdavi, Mohammad Hadi,1404,Solidarism During the 2003 Iraq War: Evaluating the UK's Invocation of the Responsibility to Protect,13th National Interdisciplinary Research Conference in Management & Humanistic Sciences,Tehran
ارائهشده در
مجموعه مقالات سیزدهمین همایش ملی تحقیقات میان رشته ای در مدیریت و علوم انسانی31 تیر 1404 · تهران